Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Pembelajaran Fikih Dengan Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v19i3.874Keywords:
Assessment, critical thinking, Fiqh, WGCTAAbstract
Abstract
One of the competencies that became the main goals in the 2013 curriculum was critical thinking. All subjects, including Islamic Religious Education (PAI), should be able to deliver students to be able to think critically. However, critical thinking skills are not given much attention to PAI learning, especially Fiqh. Likewise, in the case of valuation, there are currently not many assessment instruments specifically developed to measure the ability to think in Fiqh learning. Therefore, this article intends to design a concept for assessing critical thinking skills by adopting the critical thinking test model developed by Watson and Glaser or commonly known as the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA). Two problems will be discussed in this paper, namely, how about critical thinking in Fiqh learning, and how is the concept of Critical Thinking Ability Assessment in Fiqh learning with WGCTA. The result of this paper is a sample assessment of critical thinking skills in Fiqh learning based on five indicators in the WGCTA test, namely inference, recognition of assumptions, deduction, interpretation, and evaluation of argument.
Â
Abstrak
Salah satu kompetensi yang menjadi tujuan utama dalam kurikulum 2013 adalah berpikir kritis. Semua mata pelajaran, tak terkecuali PAI, hendaknya dapat mengantarkan peserta didik untuk mampu berpikir kritis. Meski demikian, kemampuan berpikir kritis tampaknya tidak banyak menjadi perhatian dalam pembelajaran PAI, khususnya fikih. Begitu pula, dalam hal penilaian, saat ini banyak instrumen penilaian yang secara khusus dikembangkan untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir dalam bidang fikih. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini bermaksud untuk merancang sebuah konsep penilaian kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan mengadopsi model tes critical thinking yang dikembangkan oleh Watson dan Glaser atau lazim disebut dengan Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA). Ada dua permasalahan yang akan dibahas dalam tulisan ini yakni, bagaimana kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran fikih, dan bagaimana penilaian kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran fikih dengan WGCTA. Hasil dari tulisan ini adalah sampel penilaian kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam fikih berdasarkan lima indikator dalam tes WGCTA yaitu penarikan kesimpulan, pengenalan asumsi, deduksi, interpretasi, dan evaluasi argumen.
References
Akbar, A. O. (2014). Konstruksi Epistemologis Penalaran Hukum Imam Syafi’i. Ahkam : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 14(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v14i2.1277
Ali, M. H. B. (2016). Menilai Isi Kandungan Ceramah: Kajian Kes Penceramah Yang Ditauliahkan Oleh Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor (JAIS). Reflektika, 11(2), 1-14–14. https://doi.org/10.28944/reflektika.v11i2.25
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project- Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning: Are They Effective to Improve Student’s Thinking Skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100
Bahri, F. M., & Supahar. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kritis menggunakan tes terintegrasi agama dan sains dalam pembelajaran PAI di SMA. Edukasi Islami : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 223–252.
Bahri, S. (2011). Penerapan Kaidah Hukum Islam dalam Istinbath Hukum. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, XIII(55), 59–74.
Baird, J.-A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337
Bandyopadhyay, S., & Szostek, J. (2019). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Assessing critical thinking of business students using multiple measures. Journal of Education for Business, 94(3), 259–270.
Burke, B. L., Sears, S. R., Kraus, S., & Roberts-Cady, S. (2014). Critical Analysis: A Comparison of Critical Thinking Changes in Psychology and Philosophy Classes. Teaching of Psychology, 41(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313514175
D’Alessio, F. A., Avolio, B. E., & Charles, V. (2019). Studying the impact of critical thinking on the academic performance of executive MBA students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.02.002
Dalimunthe, A. Y. (2019). Halaqah dan Munazharah Warisan Pendidikan Islam Klasik. Forum Pedagogik, 11(1), 15–26.
Danaryanti, A., & Lestari, A. T. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Matematika Mengacu pada Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Banjarmasin Tengah Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v5i2.4631
Ennis, R. H. (1958). An Appraisal of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. The Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1958.10882558
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae: Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press.
Fajrianthi, Hendriani, W., & Septarini, B. G. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Berpikir Kritis dengan Pendekatan Item Response Theory. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.6304
Grimard Wilson, D., & Wagner, E. E. (1981). The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal as a Predictor of Performance in a Critical Thinking Course. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(4), 1319–1322. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100443
Haika, R. (2016). Konsep Qath’i dan Zhanni dalam Hukum Kewarisan Islam. Mazahib, 15(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v15i2.632
Heyboer, M. W. (2009). Journeys into the Heart and Heartland of Islam. Pennsylvania: Dorrance Publishing.
Huber, C. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2016). Does College Teach Critical Thinking? A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 431–468. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917
Indah, A. D., & Fauzan, A. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Payakumbuh Menggunakan Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Matematika, 8(3), 124–129.
Jafar, M. (2016). Kedudukan akal dalam istinbath hukum menurut kajian ushul fiqh. Jurnal Al Mabhats, 1(1), 12–32.
Khodadady, E., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2011). The Impact of Concept Mapping on EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Ability. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p49
Lu, D., & Xie, Y. (2019). The effects of a critical thinking oriented instructional pattern in a tertiary EFL argumentative writing course. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 969–984.
Macpherson, K., & Owen, C. (2010). Assessment of critical thinking ability in medical students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802475471
Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4
Ma’luf, L. (1956). Al-Munjid fi al-Lughah. Beirut: Mathba’ah al-Katsulikiyah.
Mason, M. (2007). Critical Thinking and Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00343.x
Mendikbud RI. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 81A Tahun 2013. Kemendikbud RI.
Mendikbud RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 59 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah. , (2018).
Menteri Agama RI. Lampiran Keputusan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomor 183 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Bahasa Arab pada Madrasah. , (2019).
Muqoffi. (2018). Implikasi Program Bahts Al-Masa’il Terhadap Nalar Kritis Santri di Pondok Pesantren Gedangan Daleman Kedungdung Sampang. KABILAH : Journal of Social Community, 3(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.35127/kbl.v3i1.3275
Mustikarani, W., & Ruhimat, M. (2018). Kelemahan dan Keungulan Implementasi Authentic Assessment dalam Pembelajaran Geografi. GEA Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 18(2), 147–153.
Paul, R. W. (2018). Critical Thinking and Critical Person. In Thinking: The Second International Conference. New York: Routledge.
Pelu, I. E. A. S. (2016). The Rechtsvinding Epistemology of Nahdlatul ’Ulama (NU). Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 53(0), 78–85.
Riem, H. H.-, Klemm, S. B.-, Mansuy, W. G.-, Hadorn, G. H., Joye, D., Pohl, C., … Zemp, E. (2007). Ide of Handbook. In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Switzerland: Springer.
SA, R. (2015). Konsep Qath’iy-Zhanniy serta Implikasinya dalam Istinbath Hukum. Intizar, 21(1), 147–163.
Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Bussines.
Shaffat, I. (2010). Epistemologi Keilmuan Hukum Islam (Sebuah Tawaran Konsep Alternatif). Al Ihkam, 5(1), 38–62.
Sulaiman, A., & Syakarofath, N. A. (2018). Berpikir Kritis: Mendorong Introduksi dan Reformulasi Konsep dalam Psikologi Islam. Buletin Psikologi, 26(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38660
Taufiqurrahman, Heryandi, M. T., & Junaidi. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skill Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. JPII, 2(2), 199–206.
Thonney, T., & Montgomery, J. C. (2019). Defining Critical Thinking Across Disciplines: An Analysis of Community College Faculty Perspectives. College Teaching, 67(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1579700
Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
Walbridge, J. (2011). God and Logic in Islam: The Caliphate of Reason (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wasik, A. (2014). Optimalisasi Nalar Kritis Santri Dalam Sistem Bahtsul Masa’il Fiqhiyah NU. LISAN AL-HAL: Jurnal Pengembangan Pemikiran Dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 207–230.
Watson, G., & Glaser, E. (2002). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal UK Edition-Practice Test. London: Pearson Assessment.
Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
Yasid, A. (2012). Logika Induktif dan Deduktif dalam Tradisi Pemikiran Usul al-Fiqh. Asy-Syir’ah, 46(1), 1–26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Fathur Rohman, Kusaeri Kusaeri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EDUKASI Â have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, EDUKASI Â recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
 EDUKASI  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
