Evaluasi Diklat Peningkatan Kompetensi Penilaian Kinerja Guru (PKG) dan Pengembangan Keprofesionalan Berkelanjutan (PKB)

Authors

  • Ai Nurjanah Balai Diklat Keagamaan Bandung, Kementerian Agama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v17i3.615

Keywords:

Evaluation, Kirkpatrick model, PKG/PKB training, Diklat PKG dan PKB, Evaluasi, Model Kirkpatrick

Abstract

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out the effectiveness of substantive technical training implementation in improving the improvement of teacher performance and the continuous professional development that held in Bandung Religious Training Center on the year of 2017−2018 by using Kirkpatrick model. This research uses a mixed-methods with concurrent embedded types with a descriptive approach with 330 populations and 77 persons for the sample. The results for first level (reaction level) that the participants’ reaction towards training organizer has shown an average satisfaction index of 82.12 (good). The Reaction of participants to widyaiswara was 82.8 (good) on average. At level 2 (learning level), The result of knowledge aspect’s for t-test on pretest and posttest data correlated 0.34 with a significance level 0.003. It’s was indicates that education and training have been succeeded to increase the training participants’ knowledge. In the skill aspect, the average rating’s product was 91.66 (very good). The average score of the attitude aspect was 88.6 (good). For the evaluation at level 3 (behaviour level), the average score of 61.96% (47 graduated from training had shown that the training results were quite satisfying). From triangulation results of Post-Training Evaluation (EPD), the graduated from training gave positive manner statements for generally. Different from colleagues and superiors who gave negative statements. Evaluation at stage 4 (result level) demonstrated that the average percentage of t-score 63.64% or about 49 graduated had stated that they were able to obtain credit numbers according to the demand.

 

Abstrak

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui efektivitas penyelenggaraan diklat teknis substantif peningkatan kompetensi Peningkatan Kinerja Guru dan Pengembangan Keprofesionalan Berkelanjutan yang diselenggarakan di Balai Diklat Keagamaan Bandung tahun 2017−2018 menggunakan model Kirkpatrick. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kombinasi (mixed methodes) tipe concurreent embedded dengan pendekatan deskriptif dengan jumlah populasi 330 serta sampel 77 orang. Hasil penelitian pada level 1 (reaction level), reaksi peserta terhadap penyelenggara diklat memiliki indeks kepuasan rata-rata sebesar 82,12 (baik). reaksi peserta terhadap widyaiswara rata-rata sebesar 82,80 (baik).  Pada level 2 (Learning level), evaluasi pada aspek pengetahuan hasil uji-t pada data pretest dan posttest memiliki korelasi 0,34 dengan taraf signifikansi 0,003, menunjukkan bahwa diklat berhasil meningkatkan pengetahuan peserta diklat. Pada aspek keterampilan rata-rata penilaian produk sebesar 91,66 (sangat baik). Pada aspek sikap skor rata-rata sebesar 88,6 pada (baik). Evaluasi pada level 3 (behavior level), rata-rata skor t sebesar 61,96% (47 orang alumni diklat menyatakan hasil diklat memiliki pengaruh yang baik). Dari hasil triangulasi Evaluasi Pasca Diklat, alumni diklat secara umum memberikan pernyataan positif, sedangkan rekan sejawat, dan atasan secara umum memberikan pernyataan negatif. Evaluasi pada tahap 4 – level hasil (result level), hasil evaluasi menunjukkan prosentase rata-rata skor-t sebesar 63,64 % atau 49 orang alumni menyatakan dapat memperoleh angka kredit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arthur, R. (2018) ‘Evaluasi Program Diklat Karya Tulis Ilmiah Untuk Widyaiswara Pusbangtendik Kemdikbud’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), p. 35. doi: 10.21831/pep.v22i1.16749.

Badu, S. (2013) ‘Implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick Pada Perkulihan Masalah Nilai Awal dan Syarat Batas’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 48, pp. 102–129.

Dessler, G. and Angelica, D. (2015) Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Human Resource Management). 14th edn. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ikramina, F. and Gustomo, A. (2014) ‘Analisysis Of Training Evaluation Process Using Kirkpatrick’s Training Evaluation Model at PT> Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk.’, Journal of Business and Management, Volume 3(kirkpatrick Training Evaluation model), pp. 102–111.

Issac, S. and Michael, W. B. (1995) Handbook in Research and Evaluation: A Collection of Principles, Methods, and Strategies Useful in the Planning, Design, and Evaluation of Studies in Education and the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd edn. San Diego, California: EDITS Publishers.

Kirkpatrick, L. D. and James, D. K. (2008) Evaluating Training Programs The Four Levels. San Fransisco: Berret-Kohler Publishers, Inc.

Noe, R. A. (2010) Employee Training and Development. Fifth edit. Ohio: The Mc Grow-Hill Companies.

Notoatmodjo, S. (2009) Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Rhineka Cipta.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional nomor 16 (2007) Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Peraturan Pemerintah (2000) Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Jabatan Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Ramadhon, S. (2014) ‘Penerapan Model Empat Level Kirkpatrick dalam Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Aparatur di Pusdiklat Migas’, Forum Diklat, 06(1), pp. 43–54. Available at: http://pusdiklatmigas.esdm.go.id/file/d1_Penerapan__________Syafril_R.pdf.

Sallis, E. (2010) Manajemen Mutu Terpadu Pendidikan, terj. Edited by A. A. Riyadi and Fahrurrozi. Yogyakarta: IRCSoD.

Silalahi, U. (2012) Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Reflika Aditama.

Sugiyono (2008) Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono (2011) Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Ulum, Ö. G. (2015) ‘Program Evaluation through Kirkpatrick’s Framework’, Pacific Business Review International, 8(1), pp. 106–111. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295899652_Program_Evaluation_through_Kirkpatrick’s_Framework.

Undang-undang (2003) Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Undang-undang (2014a) Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Undang-undang (2014b) Pengembangan Kompetensi ASN. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-14

How to Cite

Evaluasi Diklat Peningkatan Kompetensi Penilaian Kinerja Guru (PKG) dan Pengembangan Keprofesionalan Berkelanjutan (PKB). (2019). EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v17i3.615