EVALUASI PROGRAM DIKLAT UNGGULAN PUSDIKLAT TENAGA TEKNIS PENDIDIKAN DAN KEAGAMAAN 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v17i1.585Keywords:
CIPP, Programme evaluation, Substantive technical training, Diklat teknis substantif, Evaluasi programAbstract
Abstract
This article is based on research that aimed to evaluate the implementation one of Priority Training Program for Madrasa English teachers of Ministry of Religions Affair (MoRA) Indonesia in 2018. . The  researched aspects are:  (1) the context of the legal basis, the goals and objectives of the training program; (2) input, namely curriculum, the background of human resources (organizers, instructors, participants) and education and training facilities; (3) the process, namely the object of research, namely the media and methods used in training and learning activities, as well as the suitability of the implementation of training and schedules; (4) results, namely the quality and quantity of participants who have participated in the training.This study uses a descriptive evaluative research; Context, Input, Process, and Product model (CIPP). The research sample uses purposive sampling technique with affordable samples (trainers, committees, participants) of training. Data collection techniques are: tests, observations, document studies and interviews. The data analysis technique used by researcher is: data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of the research on the implementation of the CIPP model in the Substantive Training Program of English Language National Examination at Center Education and Training, MoRA in the 2018 has been running well (systematic, planned, organized, and continuous).
Abstrak
Artikel ini merupakan hasil riset yang ditujukan mengevaluasi pelaksanaan salah satu program unggulan Pusdiklat Tenaga Teknis Pendidikan dan Keagamaan RI  yaitu Diklat Teknis Substantif Ujian Nasional (UN) Bahasa Inggris Madrasah Aliyah. Aspek yang dikaji meliputi: (1) konteks yaitu dasar hukum, tujuan dan sasaran program diklat;(2) masukan yaitu kurikulum, latar belakang sumber daya manusia (penyelenggara, pengajar, peserta) dan sarana prasarana diklat; (3) proses yaitu objek penelitian yaitu media dan metode yang digunakan dalam kegiatan pembelajaran diklat, serta kesesuaian pelaksanaan diklat dengan jadwal;(4) hasil yaitu kualitas dan kuantitas peserta yang telah mengikuti diklat. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif evaluatif dengan model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Sampel  penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan sampel terjangkau, terdiri atas unsur: panitia, widyaiswara/narasumber, dan peserta diklat. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan pada riset ini menggunakan tes, observasi, studi dokumen dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan peneliti adalah analisis data model Miles and Huberman meliputi pengumpulan data, reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian penerapan model CIPP pada Implementasi program Diklat Teknis Substantif Ujian Nasional (UN) Bahasa Inggris Madrasah Aliyah Pusdiklat Tenaga Teknis Pendidikan dan Keagamaan pada tahun 2018 didapat kesimpulan bahwa pelaksanaanya telah berjalan dengan baik (sistematik, terencana, teratur, dan berkesinambungan).
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2005. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: Renika Cipta
Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safrudin Abdul Jabar, 2009, Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Athiyah, Cut N. Ummu. (2016). Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Diklat Teknis Melalui Kegiatan Penjaminan Mutu pada 12 (Dua Belas) Balai Diklat Keagamaan. Jurnal Andragogi Pusdiklat Tenaga Teknis Keagamaan, 4(1):45-54
Gomez-Mejia, Luis, David B.Balkin, dan Robert L.Cardy,2001. Managing Human Resources. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Gronlund, N. dan Linn,R.L. 1990. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching 6th edition. NewYork: Mac Millan Publishing Co.
Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 75 Tahun 2015 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Pegawai pada Kementerian Agama.
Roger Kaufman dan Susan Thomas,1980, Evaluation without Fear. New York: New Viewpointsre
L. Stufflebeam, Daniel. 1971. Educational Evaluation & Decision Making.. . Itasca, Ill:Peackock.
L. Stufflebeam, Daniel. 2016. Factors That Influenced My Conduct of Evaluations and Evaluation Training Programs: Factors That Influenced My Conduct of Evaluations. New Directions for Evaluation. 2016.. 10.1002/ev.20188.
L. Stufflebeam, Daniel. 2003. “The CIPP Model or Evaluation,†makalah disampaikan pada Annual Conference of the Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN), 10 Maret 2003.
Madaus, George. 1985. Test Scores as Administrative mechanism in Education Policy.Phi Delta Kappan.
Setiawan, Deni. 2016. “Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan berbasisi KKNI dan Berwawasan Kebangsaan Sebagai Program Dukungan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Bidang Pendidikan†http://ojs.unm.ac.id/PSN HSIS/article/download/2760/1501(diunduh tanggal 28 Desember 2018 ).
Sukarna. 2011. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. CV. Mandar Maju. Bandung.
Suprabowo, Eko Rachmat. 2012. Evaluasi program pelatihan komputer di Balai Latihan Kerja Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Skripsi:diakses tanggal 22 Januari 2018 melalui eprints.uny.ac.id/26914/1/Eko%20Rachmat%20Suprabowo.
Suprayogo,Imam dan Tobroni. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama. Remaja Rosda Karya. Bandung.
Tri Widodo, Wahyu.2012. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Operator Komputer Di Balai Latihan Kerja Siraman Wonosari Gunungkidul. Skripsi: diakses tanggal 22 Januari 2018 melalui http://eprints.uny.ac.id/6197/1/Abstrak%20Wahyu%20Tri%20Widodo.
Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 101 Tahun 2004 tentang Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Jabatan Pegawai Negeri Sipil.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EDUKASI Â have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, EDUKASI Â recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
 EDUKASI  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
